你好。大约一年前，我们安装了新的UPVC双层玻璃窗。在两间卧室中，虽然框架的外部表面有明显的通风口，但内部通风口是没有的(现在仍然没有)。在试装的时候，我问其中一个钳工为什么没有内部通风口，他告诉我“哦，现在就是这么做的”或类似的话。基本上，内部的“石膏线”比他们所占的要低，所以内部的细流通风孔被堵塞了。很明显，在冬天，冷空气进入了空洞，停留在里面，导致框架和玻璃上过度凝结。最终，尽管他们仍然完全否认他们做了任何“错误”的事情，他们的解决方案是用硅封闭外部空隙，同时“提出”在窗扇上安装细流通风口。虽然他们已经填补了涓流通风口真空与硅我还没有，让他们把新的涓流通风口到腰带，虽然我还没有排除这一点。我的问题是.....1)如果窗户公司安装的窗户内部的涓流孔太“高”，即高于石膏线，我是否必须接受他们的解决方案，简单地用硅填充外部的涓流孔，然后回顾性地在窗框上安装涓流孔?这种做法是否可以接受，是否符合建筑法规?访美,周围的装配工空空白帧(卧室两个窗户之间的差距从中途向下5和10毫米显示但很紧腔意见的上层部分的框架)很多加注后,他们最终起飞的修剪方面揭示这些漏洞,然后注入硅而不是绝缘泡沫(小伙子说差距太窄,泵在绝缘泡沫. .我认为因为的大小喷嘴)。 So Q2) Does pumping in silicon into gaps around the side of the frames RATHER than insulating foam comply with building regs (this was done from the inside so I'm not convinced the silicon has completely filled the gaps anyway let alone whether silicone is even the right material to use) . I've asked numerous window fitters these two questions but I've had varying answers. My situation is further complicated by the fact that our flat managing company who initiated the contract with the window firm seem to be completely useless in chasing them up and seem to accept everything and anything the window company tells them without properly checking things out for themselve's with an independent surveyor or other such qualified person. Hope somebody can answer these two questions, particularly on the point whether the window companies remedial work complies with building regulations.Cheers